United States v. Parker

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Parker. Read the opinion of the Court — 273 F. App'x 243
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 4, 2009·No. 08-8463·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8463

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DEMOND O’NEIL PARKER, a/k/a Neil,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (6:99-cr-70054-nkm-9)

Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 4, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demond O’Neil Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Demond O’Neil Parker appeals the district court’s

order granting his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Parker’s motions to:

vacate the district court’s order, appoint counsel, and remand

the case, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Parker, No. 6:99-cr-70054-nkm-9 (W.D.

Va. Oct. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Parker, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Parker (United States v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related