United States v. Parker

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Parker. Read the opinion of the Court — 273 F. App'x 243
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 27, 2009·No. 08-8108·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8108

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GREGG EDWARD PARKER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (6:99-cr-70054-nkm-13)

Submitted: August 17, 2009 Decided: August 27, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregg Edward Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gregg Edward Parker appeals the district court’s order

granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v.

Parker, No. 6:99-cr-70054-nkm-13 (W.D. Va. Sept. 15, 2008). See

United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.), cert. denied,

129 S. Ct. 2401 (2009). We deny Parker’s motion for appointment

of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Parker, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Parker (United States v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dunphy
551 F.3d 247 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)