United States v. Lee

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 11, 2002
Docket01-30580
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Lee (United States v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Lee, (5th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30580 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

ELTON LEE,

Defendant- Appellant.

------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CR-196-3-F ------------------------------------------------------- January 10, 2002 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

The Assistant Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Elton Lee has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lee has

filed a response requesting the appointment of substitute counsel, which is DENIED. Our

independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lee-ca5-2002.