United States v. Jackson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 30, 2003
Docket01-30638
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Jackson (United States v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jackson, (5th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30638 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LARRY D. JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CR-222-2-B -------------------- January 29, 2003

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Larry D. Jackson entered a conditional guilty plea to

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, being a

felon in possession of a firearm, and possession with intent to

distribute cocaine. He appeals his conviction on the ground of

the issue he preserved for appeal.

The district court’s finding that Jackson consented to the

search was not clearly erroneous under the totality of the

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-30638 -2-

circumstances in light of the testimony at the suppression

hearing that Jackson was not coerced into giving his consent.

United States v. Shabazz, 993 F.2d 431, 437 (5th Cir. 1993);

United States v. Gonzales, 121 F.3d 928, 938 (5th Cir. 1997).

The judgment of conviction is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jackson-ca5-2003.