United States v. Charles

284 F.3d 567, 2002 WL 287630
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 27, 2002
DocketNo. 01-10113
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 284 F.3d 567 (United States v. Charles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Charles, 284 F.3d 567, 2002 WL 287630 (5th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

[568]*568Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Charles
301 F.3d 309 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
284 F.3d 567, 2002 WL 287630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-charles-ca5-2002.