United States v. Lee

386 F. App'x 453
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lee. Read the opinion of the Court — 321 F. App'x 298
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 30, 2010·No. 09-8219, 10-6031·Unpublished

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Paul A. Lee appeals the district court’s orders denying his: petition for reconsideration to unseal pre-indictment First Amendment issues; motion to file second supplement; motion to re-file[ ] defendant’s original sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006); motion for Rule 55(a) default judgment; motion for an order granting his § 3582(c)(2) motion; amended motion for Rule 55(a) default judgment; motion to re-file a second motion for reconsideration; and motion to re-file his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lee, No. 5:94-cr-00096-FPS-JES-1 (N.D.W.Va. Dec. 8, 9 & 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lee, 386 F. App'x 453 (4th Cir. 2010).

386 F. App'x 453 (United States v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related