United States v. Lee

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 9, 2010
Docket09-8227
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Lee (United States v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Lee, (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8227

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

PAUL A. LEE,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:89-cr-00273-FPS-1)

Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: February 9, 2010

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul A. Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Paul A. Lee appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motions to revisit and to refile. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Lee, No. 5:89-cr-00273-FPS-1 (N.D. W. Va. Dec. 9, 2009).

Appellant’s “Motion for Abeyance and Motion to Dismiss” is

denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lee-ca4-2010.