United States v. Lee
This text of United States v. Lee (United States v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8227
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
PAUL A. LEE,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:89-cr-00273-FPS-1)
Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: February 9, 2010
Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul A. Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Paul A. Lee appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motions to revisit and to refile. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Lee, No. 5:89-cr-00273-FPS-1 (N.D. W. Va. Dec. 9, 2009).
Appellant’s “Motion for Abeyance and Motion to Dismiss” is
denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lee-ca4-2010.