United States v. Lee

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8227

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

PAUL A. LEE,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:89-cr-00273-FPS-1)

Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: February 9, 2010

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul A. Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Paul A. Lee appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motions to revisit and to refile. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Lee, No. 5:89-cr-00273-FPS-1 (N.D. W. Va. Dec. 9, 2009).

Appellant’s “Motion for Abeyance and Motion to Dismiss” is

denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED