United States v. Lee

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lee. Read the opinion of the Court — 321 F. App'x 298
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 10, 2008·No. 08-6948·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6948

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

PAUL A. LEE,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:94-cr-00096-FPS-JES-1)

Submitted: September 30, 2008 Decided: October 10, 2008

Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul A. Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Paul A. Lee appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for discovery of certain electronically intercepted

communications. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Lee, No. 5:94-cr-00096-

FPS-JES-1 (N.D. W. Va. June 2, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lee, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Lee (United States v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.