United States v. Jesus Eduardo Meraz-Solomon

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Jesus Eduardo Meraz-Solomon

990 F.2d 1263, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13956, 1993 WL 102619

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 7, 1993

Docket92-50726

StatusUnpublished

This text of 990 F.2d 1263 (United States v. Jesus Eduardo Meraz-Solomon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Jesus Eduardo Meraz-Solomon, 990 F.2d 1263, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13956, 1993 WL 102619 (9th Cir. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

990 F.2d 1263w

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jesus Eduardo MERAZ-SOLOMON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 92-50726.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 1993.
Decided April 7, 1993.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION. SEE 3 F.3d 298.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI