United States v. Jesus Eduardo Meraz-Solomon
Opinion
990 F.2d 1263w
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jesus Eduardo MERAZ-SOLOMON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-50726.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 23, 1993.
Decided April 7, 1993.
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION. SEE 3 F.3d 298.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
990 F.2d 1263 (United States v. Jesus Eduardo Meraz-Solomon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.