United States v. Hawkins

373 F. App'x 362
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hawkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 589 F.3d 694
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 12, 2010·No. No. 09-8056·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Justin Hawkins appeals the district court’s order granting his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), which sought a reduction in sentence based upon the amendments to the crack cocaine sentencing guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Hawkins, No. 5:98-cr-00016-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 30, 2009 & entered Nov. 1, 2009). We deny Hawkins’ motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hawkins, 373 F. App'x 362 (4th Cir. 2010).

373 F. App'x 362 (United States v. Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related