United States v. Hawkins

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hawkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 589 F.3d 694
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 12, 2010·No. 09-8056·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8056

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JUSTIN HAWKINS, a/k/a Main,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:98-cr-00016-BO-1)

Submitted: April 1, 2010 Decided: April 12, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Justin Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Justin Hawkins appeals the district court’s order

granting his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

(2006), which sought a reduction in sentence based upon the

amendments to the crack cocaine sentencing guidelines. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm. United States v. Hawkins, No. 5:98-cr-00016-BO-1

(E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 30, 2009 & entered Nov. 1, 2009). We deny

Hawkins’ motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hawkins, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Hawkins (United States v. Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related