United States v. Hawkins
This text of United States v. Hawkins (United States v. Hawkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8259
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMAL TIMOTHY HAWKINS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:05-cr-00497-LMB-1)
Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 9, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frances H. Pratt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Jonathan Leo Fahey, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jamal Timothy Hawkins appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence
under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Hawkins, No. 1:05-cr-00497-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 7, 2008); see
United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Hawkins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hawkins-ca4-2009.