United States v. Hawkins

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hawkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 589 F.3d 694
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 9, 2009·No. 08-8259·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8259

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMAL TIMOTHY HAWKINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:05-cr-00497-LMB-1)

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 9, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frances H. Pratt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Jonathan Leo Fahey, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jamal Timothy Hawkins appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence

under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Hawkins, No. 1:05-cr-00497-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 7, 2008); see

United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hawkins, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Hawkins (United States v. Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dunphy
551 F.3d 247 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)