United States v. Gonzalez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 19, 2003·No. 01-40891·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 20, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

No. 01-40891 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAUL PEREZ GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-01-CR-179-2 --------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The lawyer appointed to represent Raul Gonzalez has

requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gonzalez

has filed no response.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities in this case, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI