United States v. Gonzalez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gonzalez. Read the opinion of the Court — 190 F.3d 668
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 16, 2001·No. 00-40382·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40382 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HIPOLITO GONZALEZ, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-95-CR-216-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 12, 2001

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hipolito

Gonzalez, Jr., has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gonzalez

has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not

filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Counsel is excused from further

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-40382 - 2 -

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gonzalez, (5th Cir. 2001).

United States v. Gonzalez (United States v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)