United States v. Gonzalez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gonzalez. Read the opinion of the Court — 190 F.3d 668
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 30, 2001·No. 00-50865·Unpublished

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-50865 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

ROJELIO ELEAZAR GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-00-CR-20-2

April 30, 2001

Before POLITZ, DAVIS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

Eva-Marie Leahey, court appointed counsel for Rojelio Eleazar Gonzalez, has

moved for leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gonzalez has received a copy of counsel’s motion

and brief but has not filed a response.

Our independent review of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused

from further responsibilities herein, and pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 42.2 the appeal is

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gonzalez, (5th Cir. 2001).

United States v. Gonzalez (United States v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)