United States v. Gonzalez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gonzalez. Read the opinion of the Court — 190 F.3d 668
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 23, 2002·No. 01-41053·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-41053 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICARDO GONZALEZ, also known as Juan Jorge De Hoyos,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-00-CR-447-1 -------------------- August 21, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ricardo Gonzalez appeals his conviction for possession with

intent to distribute cocaine. He contends that 21 U.S.C. § 841

is facially unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey,

530 U.S. 466 (2000).

As Gonzalez concedes, his argument is foreclosed by circuit

precedent. See United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied., 532 U.S. 1045 (2001). He raises

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-41053 -2-

the issue only to preserve it for Supreme Court review. The

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gonzalez, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Gonzalez (United States v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)