United States v. Gonzalez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gonzalez. Read the opinion of the Court — 190 F.3d 668
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 11, 2000·No. 99-40922·Unpublished

Opinion

No. -1-

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40922 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARIA ANGELICA GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-99-CR-178-2 -------------------- April 7, 2000

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed counsel for

Maria Angelica Gonzalez, has filed a brief as required by Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gonzalez has failed to file

a response. Our independent review of the briefs and record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused

from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is

dismissed.

MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gonzalez, (5th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Gonzalez (United States v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)