United States v. Gonzalez
This text of United States v. Gonzalez (United States v. Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-10958 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RICARDO GONZALEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:00-CR-266-8-X -------------------- March 1, 2002
Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Attorney Adrianna Martinez Goodland appointed to represent
Ricardo Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”) has requested leave to withdraw and
has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967). Gonzalez has not responded to the motion. Our
independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. -2-
MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Gonzalez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gonzalez-ca5-2002.