United States v. Gonzalez
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-10958
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus RICARDO GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:00-CR-266-8-X
--------------------
March 1, 2002
Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Attorney Adrianna Martinez Goodland appointed to represent Ricardo Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”) has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gonzalez has not responded to the motion. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No.
-2-
MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Gonzalez (United States v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.