United States v. Darnall
This text of 76 M.J. 164 (United States v. Darnall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CCA 20150010. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN FAILING TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE DIRECTLY FLOWING FROM THE ILLEGAL APPREHENSION OF APPELLANT, WHETHER THE NMCCA RULING UPHOLDING THIS DECISION CONFLATED REASONABLE SUSPICION WITH PROBABLE CAUSE, AND WHETHER THIS DECISION SHOULD BE REVERSED.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25. Appellant’s brief shall be filed within 25 days of the date of this order. Appellee’s brief shall be filed within 25 days of the filing of the Appellant’s brief. Appellant may file a reply brief within 5 days of the filing of Appellee’s brief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 M.J. 164, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-darnall-armfor-2017.