United States v. Cross
Opinion
William Terrence Cross appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (West Supp.2008) and Fed. R.Crim.P. 36 motion and denying his motion to reverse his conviction for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cross, No. 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-l (E.D.Va. Mar. 26, 2008; Apr. 9, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
289 F. App'x 603 (United States v. Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.