United States v. Cross

396 F. App'x 910
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 4, 2010·No. No. 10-6506·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Terrence Cross appeals the district court’s margin order denying his motion for lack of personal jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Cross, No. 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cross, 396 F. App'x 910 (4th Cir. 2010).

396 F. App'x 910 (United States v. Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.