United States v. Cross

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7825

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM TERRENCE CROSS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1)

Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 21, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Terrence Cross, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Terrence Cross appeals the district court’s

order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) motion to void his

criminal judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. We note that Cross attempted to use a civil

rule to attack his criminal judgment and that he has submitted

the federal jurisdiction argument numerous times and has not

demonstrated error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

order. United States v. Cross, No. 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1 (E.D.

Va. Sept. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED