United States v. Cross

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 4, 2010·No. 10-6506·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6506

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM TERRENCE CROSS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1)

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 4, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Terrence Cross, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Terrence Cross appeals the district court’s

margin order denying his motion for lack of personal

jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s order. United States v. Cross, No. 2:03-cr-

00010-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cross, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Cross (United States v. Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.