United States v. Cross
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6506
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM TERRENCE CROSS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1)
Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 4, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Terrence Cross, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
William Terrence Cross appeals the district court’s
margin order denying his motion for lack of personal
jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. United States v. Cross, No. 2:03-cr-
00010-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Cross (United States v. Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.