United States v. Carroll County Board of Education v. Linwood Woodson, Louise P. Holmes, Proposed Intervenors-Appellants

427 F.2d 141, 14 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 216, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8976
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 1, 1970
Docket29127_1
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 427 F.2d 141 (United States v. Carroll County Board of Education v. Linwood Woodson, Louise P. Holmes, Proposed Intervenors-Appellants) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Carroll County Board of Education v. Linwood Woodson, Louise P. Holmes, Proposed Intervenors-Appellants, 427 F.2d 141, 14 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 216, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8976 (5th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from the denial by the district court of a petition to intervene in a school desegregation case instituted by the United States Attorney General pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-6.

The merits of school desegregation in Carroll County are not before us, only the motion of the proposed intervenors for summary reversal of the district court’s order denying intervention.

The main suit, in which petitioners seek to intervene, has been churning through the judicial machinery for nearly five years. The judicially approved school desegregation plan, with the acceptance of both parties in the court below, was ordered into effect on May 19, 1969. Petitioners did not seek to intervene until October 16, 1969.

This court cannot say that the representation afforded by the United States Attorney General for the black students and parents of Carroll County was inadequate as a matter of law, thus allowing intervention as a matter of right. Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a).

Moreover, the finding by the district court that the motion to intervene was not timely filed in view of the present posture of the case does not evidence an abuse of discretion requiring reversal.

Accordingly, the motion of ProposedIntervenors for summary reversal of the order of the district court is denied and the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edwards v. City of Houston
78 F.3d 983 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)
Dorothy A. Edwards Afro-American Police Officers League Houston Police Organization of Spanish Speaking Officers Lionel Aaron Bennie Conway Clement B. Crosby, Jr. Jose A. Garcia Richard C. Garcia Maria L. Guillory Anthony R. Jammer Charles A. McClelland Silas Montgomery, Jr. Clyde Phillpot Carl Wayne Reed Richard M. Spencer Bruce D. Williams Terry Hughes, Individually and as a Representative of the Houston Airport Police Officers Association and Its Officers and Sergeants of the Former Airport Police Force, Houston Police Patrolmen's Union, and the Individual Peace Officers Identified in Appendix A, an Affiliate of the International Union of Police Associations Afl-Cio, Local 109 Haril Walpole Frank L. Adamek Joe M. Aldaco William E. Baker T. Barankowski Jerry A. Briscoe Ronnie P. Brooks Gregory P. Countie J. Devereux Russell Feussel Barbara Gastmyer James Klein Donald Klepac Steven McCreary Donnie Pardue James Pritchard L.N. Rackley J.R. Roberts Jackie Shallington Dennis Spradlin Stanley Stephens B.G. Willoughby Thomas Zielinski Jeffrey E. Bickel Monty T. Bradney Norman E. Graham Jeffrey L. Hatfield Roy P. Moody Arthur Osborne Cheri A. Page Vincent C. Russo W.J. Wissel, Jr. Movants-Appellants, Herman L. Mar Lily M. Yep Norman Wong Sonny N. La John Lei John Chen Phoung T. Nguyen Michael H. Gee Steven Lee Mailow Seto Jimmy S.C. Chau Peter B. Dahlman Movants, Andrew L. Kelley Anthony Comeaux Robert L. Crane James L. Dotson Barbara J. Ellison Steven Funderburk Donald R. Hardy John R. McDonald Alvin v. Young, Sr., Consolidated Willie Fields Bennie L. Green Richard Humphrey McLoy Medlock Consolidated v. City of Houston, Dorothy A. Edwards Afro-American Police Officers League Houston Police Organization of Spanish Speaking Officers Lionel Aaron Bennie Conway Clement B. Crosby, Jr. Jose A. Garcia Richard C. Garcia Maria L. Guillory Anthony R. Jammer Charles A. McClelland Silas Montgomery, Jr. Clyde Phillpot Carl Wayne Reed Richard M. Spencer Bruce D. Williams Houston Police Patrolmen's Union, and the Individual Peace Officers Identified in Appendix A, an Affiliate of the International Union of Police Associations Afl-Cio, Local 109 Haril Walpole Frank L. Adamek Joe M. Aldaco William E. Baker T. Barankowski Jerry A. Briscoe Ronnie P. Brooks Gregory P. Countie J. Devereux Russell Feussel Barbara Gastmyer James Klein Donald Klepac Steven McCreary Donnie Pardue James Pritchard L.N. Rackley J.R. Roberts Jackie Shallington Dennis Spradlin Stanley Stephens B.G. Willoughby Thomas Zielinski Jeffrey E. Bickel Monty T. Bradney Norman E. Graham Jeffrey L. Hatfield Roy P. Moody Arthur Osborne Cheri A. Page Vincent C. Russo W.J. Wissel, Jr. Movants-Appellants, and Andrew L. Kelley Anthony Comeaux Robert L. Crane James L. Dotson Barbara J. Ellison Steven Funderburk Donald R. Hardy John R. McDonald Alvin v. Young, Sr. Consolidated Willie Fields Bennie Green Richard Humphrey McLoy Medlock Consolidated Terry Hughes, Individually and as a Representative of the Houston Airport Police Officers Association and Its Officers and Sergeants of the Former Airport Police Force Herman L. Mar Lily M. Yep Norman Wong Sonny N. La John Lei John Chen Phuong T. Nguyen Michael H. Gee Steven Lee Mailow Seto Jimmy S.C. Chau Peter B. Dahlman Movants v. City of Houston, Doug Elder Mark W. Clark Movants-Appellants
78 F.3d 983 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)
In the Matter of Carson
382 N.E.2d 1116 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
427 F.2d 141, 14 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 216, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carroll-county-board-of-education-v-linwood-woodson-ca5-1970.