United States v. Byers

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Byers. Read the opinion of the Court — 649 F.3d 197
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 27, 2009·No. 08-7941·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7941

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAYLAR TASSMALL BYERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:00-cr-00137-FDW-6)

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 27, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jaylar Tassmall Byers, Appellant Pro Se. Amy E. Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jaylar Tassmall Byers appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Byers, No.

3:00-cr-00137-FDW-6 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 5, 2008). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Byers, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Byers (United States v. Byers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related