United States v. Byers
This text of United States v. Byers (United States v. Byers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7941
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAYLAR TASSMALL BYERS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:00-cr-00137-FDW-6)
Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 27, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jaylar Tassmall Byers, Appellant Pro Se. Amy E. Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jaylar Tassmall Byers appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Byers, No.
3:00-cr-00137-FDW-6 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 5, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Byers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-byers-ca4-2009.