United States v. Byers
This text of United States v. Byers (United States v. Byers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6069
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAYLAR TASSMALL BYERS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:00-cr-00137-FDW-6)
Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 29, 2008
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jaylar Tassmall Byers, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jaylar Tassmall Byers appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Byers, No. 3:00-cr-00137-FDW-6 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2007). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Byers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-byers-ca4-2008.