United States v. Byers

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Byers

275 F. App'x 248

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Byers. Read the opinion of the Court — 349 F. App'x 840 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 29, 2008·No. No. 08-6069·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jaylar Tassmall Byers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Byers, No. 3:00-cr-00137-FDW-6, 2007 WL 3346715 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[249]*249fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jaylar Tassmall Byers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Byers, No. 3:00-cr-00137-FDW-6, 2007 WL 3346715 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[249]*249fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Byers, 275 F. App'x 248 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

275 F. App'x 248 (United States v. Byers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.