United States v. Byers

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Byers. Read the opinion of the Court — 349 F. App'x 840
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 29, 2008·No. 08-6069·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6069

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAYLAR TASSMALL BYERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:00-cr-00137-FDW-6)

Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 29, 2008

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jaylar Tassmall Byers, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jaylar Tassmall Byers appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Byers, No. 3:00-cr-00137-FDW-6 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Byers, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Byers (United States v. Byers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.