United States v. Boyd

416 F. App'x 302
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Boyd. Read the opinion of the Court — 332 F. App'x 890
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 11, 2011·No. No. 10-7460·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gemini Boyd appeals the district court's text-order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). Because the district court lacked the authority to consider Boyd's motion for reconsideration, see [303]*303United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3530, 177 L.Ed.2d 1110 (2010), we affirm the district court’s order denying the motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Boyd, 416 F. App'x 302 (4th Cir. 2011).

416 F. App'x 302 (United States v. Boyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Goodwyn
596 F.3d 233 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)