United States v. Boyd

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Boyd. Read the opinion of the Court — 332 F. App'x 890
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 11, 2011·No. 10-7460·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7460

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GEMINI BOYD, a/k/a Jaraun Boyd, a/k/a Gemini,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:96-cr-00134-FDW-4)

Submitted: February 15, 2011 Decided: March 11, 2011

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gemini Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gemini Boyd appeals the district court’s text-order

denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his

motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)

(2006). Because the district court lacked the authority to

consider Boyd’s motion for reconsideration, see United States v.

Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S.

Ct. 3530 (2010), we affirm the district court’s order denying

the motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Boyd, (4th Cir. 2011).

United States v. Boyd (United States v. Boyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Goodwyn
596 F.3d 233 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)