United States v. Boyd

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7133

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOHN LEE BOYD, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:93-cr-00123-F-3)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 8, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Lee Boyd, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John Lee Boyd, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18

U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Boyd, No. 5:93-cr-

00123-F-3 (E.D.N.C. June 3, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED