United States v. Boyd

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Boyd. Read the opinion of the Court — 332 F. App'x 890
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 7, 2010·No. 10-6968·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6968

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOHN LEE BOYD, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:93-cr-00123-F-3)

Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 7, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Lee Boyd, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John Lee Boyd, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion to enforce the plea agreement. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Boyd, No. 5:93-cr-00123-F-3 (E.D.N.C.

June 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Boyd, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Boyd (United States v. Boyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.