United States v. Bell

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Bell. Read the opinion of the Court — 667 F.3d 431
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 16, 2011·No. 10-6656·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6656

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JOHN EDWARD BELL, JR., a/k/a Goochie,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:02-cr-00049-DKC-1)

Submitted: February 22, 2011 Decided: March 16, 2011

Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Edward Bell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John Edward Bell, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Bell, No. 8:02-cr-00049-DKC-1 (D. Md. Mar. 29, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bell, (4th Cir. 2011).

United States v. Bell (United States v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related