United States v. Bell

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Bell

285 F. App'x 106

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Bell. Read the opinion of the Court — 359 F. App'x 442 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 28, 2008·No. No. 08-6838·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Steven Wayne Bell appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for sentence credit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accord-' ingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 'by the district court. United States v. Bell, No. 5:01-cr-00013-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. May.l, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Steven Wayne Bell appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for sentence credit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accord-' ingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 'by the district court. United States v. Bell, No. 5:01-cr-00013-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. May.l, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Bell, 285 F. App'x 106 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

285 F. App'x 106 (United States v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.