United States v. Bell

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Bell. Read the opinion of the Court — 359 F. App'x 442
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 28, 2008·No. 08-6838·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6838

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STEVEN WAYNE BELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:01-cr-00013-BR-1)

Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 28, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Wayne Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas B. Murphy, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Steven Wayne Bell appeals the district court’s order

denying his motions for sentence credit. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bell,

No. 5:01-cr-00013-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. May 1, 2008). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bell, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Bell (United States v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.