United States v. Bell
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6838
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
STEVEN WAYNE BELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:01-cr-00013-BR-1)
Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 28, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Wayne Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas B. Murphy, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Steven Wayne Bell appeals the district court’s order
denying his motions for sentence credit. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bell,
No. 5:01-cr-00013-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. May 1, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Bell (United States v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.