United States v. Bell

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 16, 2011
Docket10-6656
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Bell (United States v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Bell, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6656

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JOHN EDWARD BELL, JR., a/k/a Goochie,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:02-cr-00049-DKC-1)

Submitted: February 22, 2011 Decided: March 16, 2011

Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Edward Bell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John Edward Bell, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Bell, No. 8:02-cr-00049-DKC-1 (D. Md. Mar. 29, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Bell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bell-ca4-2011.