United States v. Bell
This text of United States v. Bell (United States v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6656
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JOHN EDWARD BELL, JR., a/k/a Goochie,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:02-cr-00049-DKC-1)
Submitted: February 22, 2011 Decided: March 16, 2011
Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Edward Bell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
John Edward Bell, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Bell, No. 8:02-cr-00049-DKC-1 (D. Md. Mar. 29, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Bell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bell-ca4-2011.