Tynan v. General Motors Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Tynan v. General Motors Corp.

604 A.2d 99, 127 N.J. 269, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 31

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedApril 8, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by33 cases

This text of 604 A.2d 99 (Tynan v. General Motors Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tynan v. General Motors Corp., 604 A.2d 99, 127 N.J. 269, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 31 (N.J. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

*270 PER CURIAM.

The Court denied plaintiffs’ petition for certification from so much of the judgment of the Appellate Division, reported at 248 N.J.Super. 654, 591 A.2d 1024 (1991), as was unanimous. 127 N.J. 548, 606 A. 2d 362 (1991). Plaintiffs also appealed as of right pursuant to Rule 2:2-l(a)(2) on the issue of whether the Appellate Division had properly affirmed the Law Division's dismissal of their warranty-parts-reimbursement claim. So much of the judgment of the Appellate Division as affirmed that judgment of dismissal of that claim is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Cohen’s partial dissent, reported at 248 N.J.Super. at 674, 591 A.2d 1024. The matter is remanded to the Law Division for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

For reversal and remandment — Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 5.

For affirmance — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*270 PER CURIAM.

The Court denied plaintiffs’ petition for certification from so much of the judgment of the Appellate Division, reported at 248 N.J.Super. 654, 591 A.2d 1024 (1991), as was unanimous. 127 N.J. 548, 606 A. 2d 362 (1991). Plaintiffs also appealed as of right pursuant to Rule 2:2-l(a)(2) on the issue of whether the Appellate Division had properly affirmed the Law Division's dismissal of their warranty-parts-reimbursement claim. So much of the judgment of the Appellate Division as affirmed that judgment of dismissal of that claim is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Cohen’s partial dissent, reported at 248 N.J.Super. at 674, 591 A.2d 1024. The matter is remanded to the Law Division for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

For reversal and remandment — Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 5.

For affirmance — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

604 A.2d 99, 127 N.J. 269, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tynan-v-general-motors-corp-nj-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack