Thompson v. State
495 S.W.3d 776, 2016 WL 2338677, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 434
Opinion
ORDER
Devarick Thompson (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion after an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm.
The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the [777]*777reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). ■
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thompson v. State, 495 S.W.3d 776, 2016 WL 2338677, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 434 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).
495 S.W.3d 776 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.