Thompson v. State

520 S.W.3d 828, 2017 WL 2644416, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 605
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 20, 2017·No. ED 104454·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jamikeo Thompson appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Mo. App. E.D. 2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. State, 520 S.W.3d 828, 2017 WL 2644416, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 605 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

520 S.W.3d 828 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burston v. State
343 S.W.3d 691 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)