Thompson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Thompson v. State

468 S.W.3d 909, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 868, 2015 WL 5135117

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 1, 2015·No. No. ED 101558·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Dejuan Thompson appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Dejuan Thompson appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Thompson v. State, 468 S.W.3d 909, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 868, 2015 WL 5135117 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

468 S.W.3d 909 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.