Thompson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Thompson v. State

483 S.W.3d 470, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 231, 2016 WL 1085735

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 15, 2016

DocketNo. ED 102722

StatusPublished

This text of 483 S.W.3d 470 (Thompson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. State, 483 S.W.3d 470, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 231, 2016 WL 1085735 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Thompson appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Zink v. State, 278 S.W.3d 170, 175 (Mo.banc 2009). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have,' however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Thompson appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Zink v. State, 278 S.W.3d 170, 175 (Mo.banc 2009). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have,' however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

483 S.W.3d 470, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 231, 2016 WL 1085735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-state-moctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack