Thompson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Thompson v. State

566 S.W.3d 640

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 18, 2018

DocketWD 81139

StatusPublished

This text of 566 S.W.3d 640 (Thompson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. State, 566 S.W.3d 640 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Mr. Jeffrey Thompson appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Thompson contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for permitting inadmissible hearsay evidence to be presented at his trial and that the admission of this evidence prejudiced him. After a thorough review of the record and existing case precedent, we conclude that there is no precedential value in publishing our opinion. Thus, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties explaining our affirmance of the judgment. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Mr. Jeffrey Thompson appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Thompson contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for permitting inadmissible hearsay evidence to be presented at his trial and that the admission of this evidence prejudiced him. After a thorough review of the record and existing case precedent, we conclude that there is no precedential value in publishing our opinion. Thus, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties explaining our affirmance of the judgment. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

566 S.W.3d 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-state-moctapp-2018.