Terrell v. USAIR
This text of 132 F.3d 621 (Terrell v. USAIR) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring:
As the opinion for the court points out, at the relevant
time USAir had made a legitimate business decision not to
maintain part-time positions. Plaintiff adduced no evidence to
raise an issue of fact that part-time work for her was a
reasonable accommodation in this particular work context. In
light of this, plaintiff failed to carry her burden of
identifying a reasonable accommodation. Stewart v. Happy
Herman’s Cheshire Bridge, Inc., 117 F.3d 1278, 1286 (11th Cir.
1997) (a plaintiff has the burden of proving that the
accommodation identified by plaintiff is reasonable).
Accordingly, I concur and join the opinion for the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
132 F.3d 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terrell-v-usair-ca11-1998.