Taylor v. State

295 S.W.3d 901, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1558, 2009 WL 3571361
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 3, 2009·No. WD 70486·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Paul Taylor appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a jury trial, he was convicted of committing violence against an officer in the department of corrections, section 217.385. He contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel used the correction officer’s incident report for impeachment but did not offer the report into evidence.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 295 S.W.3d 901, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1558, 2009 WL 3571361 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

295 S.W.3d 901 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Roper
295 S.W.3d 901 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)