State v. Roper
295 S.W.3d 901, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1556, 2009 WL 3571358
Opinion
ORDER
David S. Roper appeals the trial court’s judgment sentencing him to serve a total of twenty-five years after Roper was convicted of three counts of delivering a controlled substance. On appeal, Roper claims that the trial court erred in overrul *902 ing his request for counsel at the resen-tencing hearing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Roper, 295 S.W.3d 901, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1556, 2009 WL 3571358 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
295 S.W.3d 901 (State v. Roper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Taylor v. State
295 S.W.3d 901 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)