Taylor v. State

249 S.W.3d 241, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 443, 2008 WL 850206
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1457
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 1, 2008·No. ED 90142·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Demetrius Taylor, appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order and judgment denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion *242 for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 249 S.W.3d 241, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 443, 2008 WL 850206 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

249 S.W.3d 241 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.