Taylor v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Tyron Taylor (“Movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion after an evidentiary hearing. A jury convicted Movant of first degree robbery, Section 569.020 RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo 2000. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of twenty years’ imprisonment on each count. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. The trial court’s judgment was supported by substantial evidence on the record. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the general principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
179 S.W.3d 391 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.