Taylor v. State

179 S.W.3d 391, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1820, 2005 WL 3288108
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1457
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 6, 2005·No. ED 85474·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tyron Taylor (“Movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion after an evidentiary hearing. A jury convicted Movant of first degree robbery, Section 569.020 RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo 2000. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of twenty years’ imprisonment on each count. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. The trial court’s judgment was supported by substantial evidence on the record. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the general principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 179 S.W.3d 391, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1820, 2005 WL 3288108 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

179 S.W.3d 391 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Geist v. Director of Revenue
179 S.W.3d 391 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)